Y2K PROBLEM:
APOCALYPTIC THINKING AND THE TRAGIC FLAW
What will happen when the clock strikes 01.01.01.01.00? Will elevators stop
dead between floors, power plants shut down, and airplanes fall out of the
sky? Will the Internet and communication infrastructures crash? Will the
world's economy collapse as the vast network of banking computers spin out
of control, throwing the whole world itself into chaos?
Some people think so. As you read this, they are stockpiling food and
supplies in anticipation of a society so crippled by the Y2K bug that it
will crumble into anarchy. They truly believe The End is near. Others are
not so extreme in their fears, but still expect some major mishaps once the
clock strikes the new millennium. Make sure you have good hardcopy records
of all your finances. And don't fly on January 1.
In some cases apocalyptic thinking is part of a social movement. History is
filled with examples of small cults and larger religious and
quasi-religious groups that predicted the end of the world. In many cases
they borrowed the apocalyptic mind set from the world of Christianity,
where some fundamentalists devoutly point to the end of the world as
prophetized in the Book of Revelations. The belief system of many modern
cults and spiritual groups is a hodgepodge conglomeration of ideas from
religion, philosophy, psychology, the occult, and science. It's the
injection of those "scientific" ideas into their ideology that justifies
it, that makes it seem rational, logical, indisputable.
The Y2K dilemma is the perfect technological spice to throw into that
ideological soup in order to make it palatable to those who have doubts,
and raise the fever of
those who already believe. If computer people are worried about the
Millennium Bug, then it must be scientifically valid to panic about it,
right? Fundamentalist and survivalist groups that promote apocalyptic
visions also benefit from the scientism of Y2K fright. It's a very handy
tool in proselytizing. "Join us now, before it's too late." Even if there
was no Y2K problem, we would still see these End of the World predictions
popping up here and there across the world. A new millennium is
approaching. It's a big milestone. Some think the LAST milestone. Y2K
simply amplifies the trepidation.
For individuals who are wrought with anxiety about Y2K, it's not so much a
social movement that sweeps them up, but rather an internal dynamic. Some
unfortunate people grew up in a family or an environment marked by extreme
unpredictability or unexpected trauma. Worry, suspicion, or even outright
paranoia about what lies around the next bend has been burned into their
psyche. Often in their lives they become preoccupied with anxious
anticipation of cataclysm. For some, Y2K looms before them as a seemingly
real omen of upcoming disaster. Exactly what calamity it will bring, no one
knows for sure. But it will be calamity. It's well known that one component
of depression is the tendency to engage in the style of faulty thinking
called "catastrophizing" - i.e., predicting and anticipating crisis, often
based on little or no evidence. In some cases, Y2K anxiety may be an
expression of this cognitive distortion associated with depression.
There are a variety of facets to catastrophic thinking and its close
relative, apocalyptic thinking. We see these same facets in Y2K anxiety,
with a technological spin.
For example,
- The fear of helplessness and loss of control.
Computers are supposed to help us manage our lives and society, but
if the Y2K bug prevails, computers will bring about the end of our
control over civilization;
- A fear of change and the unknown. The
New Millennium moves towards us at a time in human history when computers
are rapidly altering our lives. Where will they take us? The Y2K bug
is a shocking reminder that we don't know;
- A fear of interdependence. The survivalist
believes other people and society cannot be trusted to protect and
take care of you. You have to rely on yourself, even isolate yourself.
As such, the Y2K Bug is the survivalist's worst nightmare. Even if
you secure your own machine, you cannot account for other machines
that may be interconnected to it. Depending on others will lead to
your downfall.
- A fear of retribution. The apocalypse
is not simply the end. It's payback time, the moment of judgment and
retribution.
The Millennium Bug warns us
not to take too much pride in this massive computerized world that we have
built. We think we are in control, that technology has brought us closer to
perfection, mastery, and a divine-like state of knowledge. But like the
Titanic, our glorious achievement can fail miserably. It can turn on us. We
will be punished for our hubris. In what becomes a Revenge of the Machines,
our own creation can retaliate against its creator.
The Y2K bug reminds me of the concept of the tragic flaw in classic Greek
literature. The hero has a weakness -- a secret, hidden vulnerability that
he himself may not realize, an Achilles heel. At the peak of his triumph,
it comes back to haunt him. It triggers his downfall. In their quest for
speed and efficiency, computer programmers of the 60s and 70s failed to
predict the possibility that their simplified technique for encoding time
could eventually lead to a total breakdown, the collapse of all speed and
efficiency. Time would come back to punish them for the flawed
representation of time that they built into their machines. Those machines
are but an extension, a reflection of their creators -- flawed, imperfect,
and often unaware of their imperfection. And Y2K is the wake-up call. It's
the reminder that the computers we created -- that we ourselves -- are not
invulnerable. By our very nature, we make mistakes. Y2K anxiety is the
anxious realization that despite our best, heroic efforts, we can screw up
big time.
In this article I've been tossing around terms like "phobia" and "paranoia"
in order to emphasize the problematic side of Y2K thinking. A phobia is an
unrealistic, irrational, exaggerated fear. But is the anxiety about the
Millennium bug totally unjustified? Some say that just because you're
paranoid, it doesn't mean that people aren't out to get you. Speaking for
myself, I seriously doubt that civilization is going to collapse after New
Years Eve 1999.... but I don't plan to be on any planes on January 1 either.
2/13/99
John Suler, PhD, is Professor of Psychology
at Rider University and a practicing clinical psychologist. He has published
on psychotherapy, mental imagery, and eastern philosophy. He currently maintains
several web sites.
Back
|